# BR18 Standardformat Report not aligning with Insights **URL:** \ **Category:** Help\ **Created:** [January 29, 2025, 12:32pm UTC](https://community.realtimelca.com/t/br18-standardformat-report-not-aligning-with-insights/242 "2025-01-29T12:32:18Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 5
**Author:** ![MarkLabrosse](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex005/user_avatar/community.realtimelca.com/marklabrosse/32/206_2.png) [@MarkLabrosse](https://community.realtimelca.com/u/MarkLabrosse)\ **Post date:** [January 30, 2025, 1:22pm UTC](https://community.realtimelca.com/t/br18-standardformat-report-not-aligning-with-insights/242/5 "2025-01-30T13:22:32Z")
We also discussed the same issue here: > [@Mapping for report (Danish standard)](https://community.realtimelca.com/t/mapping-for-report-danish-standard/98/5): > > We are also talking about the same issue at our office. It seems funny, that we need to spent so much time on something that doesn’t have any influence on the LCA results sweat_smile Especially given that the standardformat for LCA-documentation in BR18 is optional. Would it be possible to add all unclassified materials under some generic category, so that you don’t have to classify everything manually to create a report? Having a category in the report called “No classification code” is suff… When classifications have been applied properly, the standard report works great, but we still need a feature that allows us to change or add a classification to a `building component type`. I this isn’t done correct from the start, there doesn’t seem to be anything to do for now 😅 --- _[View the full topic](https://community.realtimelca.com/t/br18-standardformat-report-not-aligning-with-insights/242)._